<rss version="2.0" xmlns:syndicaat="http://www.hitsyndicaat.com/1.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:ag="http://purl.org/rss/modules/aggregation">
<channel>
<title>Corante Media Hub</title><description>Corante Media Hub &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.corante.com/&quot;&gt;http://media.corante.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><link>http://media.corante.com</link><managingEditor>MySyndicaat Team</managingEditor><language>en</language><copyright>Copyright: MySyndicaat</copyright><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:29:38 GMT</lastBuildDate>        <category>media</category>
        <category>new media</category>
        <category>web 2.0</category>
        <category>technology</category>
<item>
<title>Legislature to Hold Hearing on Reporters&apos; Shield Bill</title><content:encoded><![CDATA[Massachusetts remains one of the minority of states without a shield law to protect journalists' confidential sources. That could change if a bill to be heard by the legislature next week becomes law. The bill, <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/house/186/ht01pdf/ht01650.pdf">House Bill 1650</a>, would prohibit courts and government agencies from forcing members of the news media to reveal their news sources. The bill would also protect reporters against the compelled disclosure of notes, outtakes, photographs and recordings.<br><br>The bill is under review by the legislature's <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/comm/j19.htm">Joint Committee on the Judiciary</a>, which has scheduled it for a <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/hearings/02-23-2010_DAILY_HEARING_LIST.htm">public hearing</a> on Tuesday, Feb. 23, at 1 p.m. in State House Room B1. If you have any interest in supporting this bill, you should show up and make your position known to the members of the committee.<br><br>Notably, the bill as drafted would cover some bloggers as well as traditional print and broadcast journalists. Coverage is not based on a journalist's employment, but on the journalist's engagement in "bona fide news gathering" for any form of news media. "News media" is defined as "any entity that is in the regular business of news gathering and disseminating news or information to the public by any means, including, but not limited to, print, broadcast, photographic, mechanical, internet, or electronic distribution."<br><br>Thus, a blogger who is engaged in news gathering and who regularly gathers and disseminates news would be covered by the bill if it became law.<br><br>This bill is derived from one that was filed in the previous session of the legislature and that I helped draft as part of an ad hoc coalition of journalists, news organizations and ...]]></content:encoded><link>http://www.legaline.com/2010/02/legislature-to-hold-hearing-on.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8139998.post-8250255437848412517</guid><author>Robert Ambrogi</author><category>shield+law+ </category><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:58:00 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.legaline.com/medialaw_rss.xml">Media Law</source><ag:source>Media Law</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.legaline.com/medialaw_rss.xml</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>The Book Business</title><description><![CDATA[Here’s a “trailer” for the video version of a talk I did for MediaBistro about the future of book publishing in an electronic era. I will try to find the whole thing, or some way for rushkoff.com people to see the entirety, as it was a free talk and free might as well be [...]]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object height="340" width="560"><param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/M49mbp3yR4s&hl=en_US&fs=1&" name="movie"><param value="true" name="allowFullScreen"><param value="always" name="allowscriptaccess"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/M49mbp3yR4s&hl=en_US&fs=1&" allowscriptaccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" height="272" width="448"></embed></object></p><p>Here’s a “trailer” for the video version of a talk I did for MediaBistro about the future of book publishing in an electronic era. I will try to find the whole thing, or some way for <a href="http://rushkoff.com" target="_blank" title="http://rushkoff.com">rushkoff.com</a> people to see the entirety, as it was a free talk and free might as well be free.</p><div class="feedflare"><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?a=suLeZe52ZCA:AdOjGlDb2O0:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?d=yIl2AUoC8zA" border="0"></a><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?a=suLeZe52ZCA:AdOjGlDb2O0:D7DqB2pKExk"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?i=suLeZe52ZCA:AdOjGlDb2O0:D7DqB2pKExk" border="0"></a><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?a=suLeZe52ZCA:AdOjGlDb2O0:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?d=7Q72WNTAKBA" border="0"></a><a></a></div> ...]]></content:encoded><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/douglasrushkoff/~3/suLeZe52ZCA/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushkoff.com/?p=4122</guid><author>Douglas</author><category>uncategorized+ </category><pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 14:24:54 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.rushkoff.com/rssfeed.xml">Douglas Rushkoff</source><ag:source>Douglas Rushkoff</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.rushkoff.com/rssfeed.xml</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>SJC Affirms Public&apos;s Right to View Jury Selection</title><content:encoded><![CDATA[The Massachusetts <a href="http://www.mass.gov/courts/sjc/">Supreme Judicial Court</a> issued an important decision today underscoring the right of the public and the press to sit in on jury selection in criminal cases. The opinion, <a href="http://www.westlaw.com/find/default.wl?SerialNum=2021353437&DB=MA%2DORSLIP&FindType=Y&sp=massof%2D1000&RS=ICLP2.0&VR=1.0&SV=Full&DOLOCATE=Locate&LQuery=to%28allsct%20allsctrs%20allsctoj%20allapp%20allapprs%29" target="_blank">Commonwealth v. Cohen</a>, concludes that even a partial closure of the courtroom -- with some family members and non-parties allowed in -- can violate both the First Amendment rights of the public and press and the Sixth Amendment rights of the defendant.<br><blockquote>The public trial right applies to jury selection proceedings ... which are "a crucial part of any criminal case." ... At that stage, "the primacy of the accused's right [to a public trial] is difficult to separate from the right of everyone in the community to attend the voir dire which promotes fairness." ... The "sure knowledge that anyone is free to attend gives assurance that established procedures are being followed and that deviations will become known." ... Throughout a trial, an open court room "enhances both the basic fairness of the criminal trial and the appearance of fairness so essential to public confidence in the system." ... Thus, courts recognize a "strong presumption in favor of a public trial," ... "overcome only by an overriding interest based on findings that closure is essential to preserve higher values and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest."</blockquote>The case arose out of jury empanelment in the criminal prosecution of David M. Cohen, an attorney and former Stoughton, Mass., police sergeant. On the fourth day of ...]]></content:encoded><link>http://www.legaline.com/2010/02/sjc-affirms-publics-right-to-view-jury.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8139998.post-6549881342402052183</guid><author>Robert Ambrogi</author><category>court+access+first+amendment+ </category><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:16:00 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.legaline.com/medialaw_rss.xml">Media Law</source><ag:source>Media Law</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.legaline.com/medialaw_rss.xml</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>PBS Roundtable in Full Swing</title><description><![CDATA[I’m leading a series of monthly roundtables at http://pbsdigitalnation.org . They will be in the style of Steven Johnson’s original Feed magazine – or as close to that as we can get for the time being – where visitors can develop threaded conversations around the original posts. The first topic is the PBS Frontline’s Digital [...]]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m leading a series of monthly roundtables at <a href="http://pbsdigitalnation.org">http://pbsdigitalnation.org </a>. They will be in the style of Steven Johnson’s original Feed magazine – or as close to that as we can get for the time being – where visitors can develop threaded conversations around the original posts.</p><p>The first topic is the PBS Frontline’s Digital Nation documentary, and – perhaps predictably – not everyone in the show likes the way it came out. This is how one from Henry Jenkins begins:</p><blockquote><p>I frankly found the documentary itself mind-numbing and relentless. It rarely trusts the viewer to draw their own conclusions about what they are seeing and it deploys much of the material in ways which point towards a much less nuanced conclusion than any of the participants in the conversation might have advocated. The website allows us to ask our own questions, while the documentary tells us what to think.</p></blockquote><p>And here’s a snip from Second Life founder Philip Rosedale’s thoughts on the end of text:</p><blockquote><p>Hi! Although sequentially reading the individual words comprising an entire novel is a wonderful and complete experience (I’m 41 and spent a big part of my childhood reading everything I could well before computers were available), the most recent research in how the brain is probably organized suggests a better fit between the way we ‘read’ in the digital world of today and the way we actually store and manipulate information internally. The magnificent sense of ‘getting’ Great Expectations has to do with fractal/hierarchical memories that are simultaneously evoked and span different levels of abstraction/cognition. So each of us a has a different (but fairly similar) high level</p></blockquote> ...]]></content:encoded><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/douglasrushkoff/~3/kMpow538id8/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushkoff.com/?p=4120</guid><author>Douglas</author><category>uncategorized+ </category><pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:20:01 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.rushkoff.com/rssfeed.xml">Douglas Rushkoff</source><ag:source>Douglas Rushkoff</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.rushkoff.com/rssfeed.xml</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>Survey of Media Access to Mass. Courts</title><content:encoded><![CDATA[The <a href="http://www.mass.gov/courts/sjc/media/judiciary-media.html">Judiciary/Media Committee</a> of the <a href="http://www.mass.gov/courts/sjc/">Supreme Judicial Court</a> is considering revisions to the <a href="http://www.mass.gov/courts/sjc/docs/pubaccess.pdf">Guidelines on the Public's Right of Access to Judicial Proceedings and Records</a>. In order to evaluate whether the guidelines should be amended or expanded and what other initiatives the committee might wish to pursue, the committee is asking members of the news media to complete a survey on media access to the courts.<br /><br />As a member of the Judiciary/Media Committee and in my capacity as executive director of the <a href="http://masspublishers.org/">Massachusetts Newspaper Publishers Association</a>, I am helping to disseminate the survey and compile its results. If you are a journalist who covers the Massachusetts courts, please take a moment to complete the survey and return it to me.<br /><br />You can download the survey here, in Microsoft Word format: <a href="http://masspublishers.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/judiciarymediasurveyfinal.doc">Survey of Media Access to Courts</a>.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/8139998-429194517427098995?l=www.legaline.com%2Fmedialaw.html' alt='' /></div>]]></content:encoded><link>http://www.legaline.com/2010/02/survey-of-media-access-to-mass-courts.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8139998.post-429194517427098995</guid><author>Robert Ambrogi</author><pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:22:00 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.legaline.com/medialaw_rss.xml">Media Law</source><ag:source>Media Law</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.legaline.com/medialaw_rss.xml</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>Review: &apos;Drupal 6 JavaScript and jQuery&apos;</title><description><![CDATA[Let's start with a confession: I don't like JavaScript. I don't like object notation and I don't like programming languages where whitespace (line enders) is significant. I cut my teeth on C, and I am suspicious of any deviation from its spartan truth. I also don't trust power windows and think the Volvo 240 was the pinnacle of automotive engineering, just to put it all in context. And I already have a book on JavaScript: "Programming JavaScript for Netscape 2.0." It's on the dusty, rarely visited end of my bookshelf, right next to "Internet Starter Kit" with a floppy disk containing TurboGopher 1.07. So I'm not a great candidate to review the book on JavaScript that Packt shipped me a couple of months ago. Nevertheless, I'm impressed with Matt Butcher's "Drupal 6 JavaScript and jQuery." Like it or not, the poorly named JavaScript ( it has nothing to do with Java ) is the most dependable client-side programming tool we have. With Apple's recent attack on Flash, which is banned from the iPad, it's going to become even more important. If you want pages to do anything more than sit there and look at you, JavaScript is your tool, period. So deal with it. Butcher's book is really about three things: The JavaScript language as it's currently implemented, the jQuery library that gives JavaScript a set of simple but powerful incantations that can cast magic spells on HTML, and how both of them fit into Drupal's modular, themeable framework. In the preface, Butcher declares, "you will learn everything you need in this book." That's overly ambitious but only slightly so; if you're generally familiar with HTML and pretty much any programming language, you'll be able to follow along without difficulty. Butcher is literate (he's working on a Ph.D. in philosophy at Loyola), a veteran technical writer (five books for Packt Publishing) and a bona fide Drupal developer (for Chicago-based ...]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[Let's start with a confession: I don't like JavaScript. I don't like object notation and I don't like programming languages where whitespace (line enders) is significant. I cut my teeth on C, and I am suspicious of any deviation from its spartan truth. I also don't trust power windows and think the Volvo 240 was the pinnacle of automotive engineering, just to put it all in context. And I already have a book on JavaScript: "Programming JavaScript for Netscape 2.0." It's on the dusty, rarely visited end of my bookshelf, right next to "Internet Starter Kit" with a floppy disk containing TurboGopher 1.07. So I'm not a great candidate to review the book on JavaScript that Packt shipped me a couple of months ago. Nevertheless, I'm impressed with Matt Butcher's "Drupal 6 JavaScript and jQuery." Like it or not, the poorly named JavaScript ( it has nothing to do with Java ) is the most dependable client-side programming tool we have. With Apple's recent attack on Flash, which is banned from the iPad, it's going to become even more important. If you want pages to do anything more than sit there and look at you, JavaScript is your tool, period. So deal with it. Butcher's book is really about three things: The JavaScript language as it's currently implemented, the jQuery library that gives JavaScript a set of simple but powerful incantations that can cast magic spells on HTML, and how both of them fit into Drupal's modular, themeable framework. In the preface, Butcher declares, "you will learn everything you need in this book." That's overly ambitious but only slightly so; if you're generally familiar with HTML and pretty much any programming language, you'll be able to follow along without difficulty. Butcher is literate (he's working on a Ph.D. in philosophy at Loyola), a veteran technical writer (five books for Packt Publishing) and a bona fide Drupal developer (for Chicago-based ...]]></content:encoded><link>http://www.yelvington.com/content/review-drupal-6-javascript-and-jquery</link><guid isPermaLink="false">601 at http://www.yelvington.com</guid><author>yelvington</author><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 17:45:26 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.yelvington.com/rss20.php">yelvington.com</source><ag:source>yelvington.com</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.yelvington.com/rss20.php</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>art colonies: as a whole, they can do more than any one...</title><description><![CDATA["Colonies are self-organizing, decentralized, cooperative. As a whole, they can do more than any one ant or termite or bee can." That's the notes to one slide in a recent talk at IgniteNOLA I gave on immersive, interactive arts from...]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://evelynrodriguez.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345159c669e20120a863206f970b-pi" style="float: right;"><img alt="Beecolony-ignite" src="http://evelynrodriguez.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345159c669e20120a863206f970b-500wi" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8345159c669e20120a863206f970b "></a> "Colonies are self-organizing, decentralized, cooperative. As a whole, they can do more than any one ant or termite or bee can."</strong></p><p>That's the notes to one slide in a recent talk at <a title="IgniteNOLA" target="_blank" href="http://www.ignitenola.org">IgniteNOLA</a> I gave on <a title="immersive interactive Internet art" target="_blank" href="http://www.fuguegame.com/blog/retrospectiveofinteractiveinternetartinyear2020">immersive, interactive arts</a> from the 20/20 hindsight perspective of the year 2020.</p><p><strong>The main reason I blog is to connect with my colony.</strong> I don't expect this to be an overnight endeavor. When I first began blogging about social media and marketing in 2004, it took about four months to find my colony. It was brilliant. Mutual support rocks.</p><p>I don't reside in that colony. There are vast constellations of colonies in a pluralistic, diverse universe. You'll know if we're in the same one.</p><p><a style="float: right;" href="http://evelynrodriguez.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345159c669e20120a8632203970b-pi"><img alt="Artisan-ignite-txt" src="http://evelynrodriguez.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8345159c669e20120a8632203970b-800wi" style="margin: 0px 0px 5px 5px;" border="0" class="asset asset-image at-xid-6a00d8345159c669e20120a8632203970b image-full "></a></p> ...]]></content:encoded><link>http://evelynrodriguez.typepad.com/crossroads_dispatches/2010/02/colonies-are-self-organizing-decentralized-cooperative-as-a-whole.html</link><guid>http://evelynrodriguez.typepad.com/crossroads_dispatches/2010/02/colonies-are-self-organizing-decentralized-cooperative-as-a-whole.html</guid><author>Evelyn Rodriguez</author><pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:43:29 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://evelynrodriguez.typepad.com/crossroads_dispatches/index.rdf">Crossroads Dispatches</source><ag:source>Crossroads Dispatches</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://evelynrodriguez.typepad.com/crossroads_dispatches/index.rdf</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>Crowd-jamming a New Book Title for Life Inc.</title><description><![CDATA[So RandomHouse has agreed to do a paperback version of Life Inc: How the world became a corporation and how to take it back. I’m going to add an extensive “resources” section to the end, with contributions from people and organizations who are succeeding at that challenge. But they also want to retitle the book. [...]]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So RandomHouse has agreed to do a paperback version of <i>Life Inc: How the world became a corporation and how to take it back.</i></p><p>I’m going to add an extensive “resources” section to the end, with contributions from people and organizations who are succeeding at that challenge.</p><p>But they also want to retitle the book. Maybe to something more specific, or at least more evocative. Most people think the book was called “Life” as it is.</p><p>So, I am opening this quest up for collaborative frenzy. Help?</p><p>The book is about the way value creation and exchange has been legally monopolized by corporations and central banks – as well as how this dehumanizes us. It concludes with ways to take back peer to peer value exchange, and collapse this corporotacracy in the process. Click on the movie above for the 9-minute gist.</p><p>But I need a new title – ideally a better one, that will interest more people. Capitalism: A Love Story was a much more accessible title than Life Inc, for example.</p><p>If you come up with a title that works, I’ll give you something – like a bunch of books and credit – as well as my thanks.</p><div class="feedflare"><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?a=TCob40s9f5s:xnNJ3I4qrSg:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?d=yIl2AUoC8zA"></a><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?a=TCob40s9f5s:xnNJ3I4qrSg:D7DqB2pKExk"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?i=TCob40s9f5s:xnNJ3I4qrSg:D7DqB2pKExk"></a><a></a></div> ...]]></content:encoded><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/douglasrushkoff/~3/TCob40s9f5s/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushkoff.com/?p=4102</guid><author>Douglas</author><category>uncategorized+ </category><pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:37:54 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.rushkoff.com/rssfeed.xml">Douglas Rushkoff</source><ag:source>Douglas Rushkoff</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.rushkoff.com/rssfeed.xml</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>Digital Nation Roundtable now LIVE</title><description><![CDATA[I’m hosting a new place for discussions about our digital future, the Digital Nation Roundtable, on the PBS Frontline site. I don’t have the direct link yet, so scroll down that page a screen until you see it. And the join in!]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m hosting a new place for discussions about our digital future, the <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/digitalnation/view/">Digital Nation Roundtable</a>, on the PBS Frontline site.</p><p>I don’t have the direct link yet, so scroll down that page a screen until you see it. And the join in!</p><div class="feedflare"><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?a=JBZN-EXmGXc:YMr3xW1np-Y:yIl2AUoC8zA"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?d=yIl2AUoC8zA"></a><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?a=JBZN-EXmGXc:YMr3xW1np-Y:D7DqB2pKExk"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?i=JBZN-EXmGXc:YMr3xW1np-Y:D7DqB2pKExk"></a><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?a=JBZN-EXmGXc:YMr3xW1np-Y:7Q72WNTAKBA"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?d=7Q72WNTAKBA"></a><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?a=JBZN-EXmGXc:YMr3xW1np-Y:V_sGLiPBpWU"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?i=JBZN-EXmGXc:YMr3xW1np-Y:V_sGLiPBpWU"></a><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?a=JBZN-EXmGXc:YMr3xW1np-Y:qj6IDK7rITs"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?d=qj6IDK7rITs"></a><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?a=JBZN-EXmGXc:YMr3xW1np-Y:gIN9vFwOqvQ"><img border="0" src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~ff/douglasrushkoff?i=JBZN-EXmGXc:YMr3xW1np-Y:gIN9vFwOqvQ"></a></div><img> ...]]></content:encoded><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/douglasrushkoff/~3/JBZN-EXmGXc/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushkoff.com/?p=4100</guid><author>Douglas</author><category>uncategorized+ </category><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:13:35 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.rushkoff.com/rssfeed.xml">Douglas Rushkoff</source><ag:source>Douglas Rushkoff</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.rushkoff.com/rssfeed.xml</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>Looking for journogeeks</title><description><![CDATA[ Life is change, and we've had some great people change their lives by leaving Morris DigitalWorks to take on new challenges in the Web consulting and development world. We're sad to see them go, but excited when they wind up working on cool projects like  Whitehouse.gov So we're looking to grow a new crop of wizards, and in the mix we're going to be recruiting some journogeeks. A journogeek is someone who loves Web technology, is a creative problem-solver, and has an aptitude for growth but also brings a commitment to our journalistic mission. We've made a commitment to change how we work. We're placing Web tools in the hands of every journalist at every one of our newspapers. These tools need to be made better, and that requires close collaboration among journalists and developers, and iterative development. We've made a commitment to the principles of Open Source as well, not only using it but  contributing  significantly to the Drupal development community. If this sounds interesting, feel free to contact me and I'll make sure you're notified of each position as it comes available. Right now we're looking for a senior designer. Upcoming shortly we anticipate several developer positions that might range from intern up to grand wizard. Bring your own hat.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[ Life is change, and we've had some great people change their lives by leaving Morris DigitalWorks to take on new challenges in the Web consulting and development world. We're sad to see them go, but excited when they wind up working on cool projects like  Whitehouse.gov So we're looking to grow a new crop of wizards, and in the mix we're going to be recruiting some journogeeks. A journogeek is someone who loves Web technology, is a creative problem-solver, and has an aptitude for growth but also brings a commitment to our journalistic mission. We've made a commitment to change how we work. We're placing Web tools in the hands of every journalist at every one of our newspapers. These tools need to be made better, and that requires close collaboration among journalists and developers, and iterative development. We've made a commitment to the principles of Open Source as well, not only using it but  contributing  significantly to the Drupal development community. If this sounds interesting, feel free to contact me and I'll make sure you're notified of each position as it comes available. Right now we're looking for a senior designer. Upcoming shortly we anticipate several developer positions that might range from intern up to grand wizard. Bring your own hat.]]></content:encoded><link>http://www.yelvington.com/content/looking-journogeeks</link><guid isPermaLink="false">600 at http://www.yelvington.com</guid><author>yelvington</author><pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 19:01:51 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.yelvington.com/rss20.php">yelvington.com</source><ag:source>yelvington.com</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.yelvington.com/rss20.php</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>Blows against the empire: iPad, Chrome, HTML5 and Android</title><description><![CDATA[It hasn't been a good month for Microsoft. First Google with its Nexus One, then Apple with its iPad, have highlighted how its empire is in risk of falling, replaced by a new mobile world in which Microsoft is irrelevant. Most revolutions fail because the revolutionaries can't stay united. This one is no different. And there is plenty of skirmishing among the revolutionaries. Apple and Adobe are engaged in a battle in which Apple seeks to use HTML 5 to snuff out Flash. Google and Apple, once lovey-dovey to the point that Google's CEO was on Apple's board of directors, are squared off over Android . And so on. But Microsoft continues to be the big target. Specifically, it's the Microsoft-dominated "desktop model" of computing. I'm not talking about the size or portability of the PC, but rather the metaphor of a desktop, folders, and applications. It's a world in which the so-called network effect makes it nearly impossible for any competitor to catch up. Regardless of how much money Apple spends on those Mac vs. PC commercials, the Mac will forever be a minority player. So both Apple and Google -- for very different reasons -- are setting out to smash the empire by creating entirely new systems. The iPad aims to create a new model of consumer-focused computing and rally independent developers into an army totally controlled by Apple, unable to function without dependence on its company store. That army's rules are harsh. If you wonder, go read the terms to which you have to agree in order to become blessed as an iPad developer. The reward is a perhaps better life than independent developers have had under the bitter rule of Microsoft, which has a habit of visiting upstart startups with an offer they can't refuse. Google's aims are different: to perpetuate its vision of an empire built by organizing all the world's information, not by creating sexy consumer devices. Microsoft is the single biggest threat to that vision, so Google has set forth ...]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[It hasn't been a good month for Microsoft. First Google with its Nexus One, then Apple with its iPad, have highlighted how its empire is in risk of falling, replaced by a new mobile world in which Microsoft is irrelevant. Most revolutions fail because the revolutionaries can't stay united. This one is no different. And there is plenty of skirmishing among the revolutionaries. Apple and Adobe are engaged in a battle in which Apple seeks to use HTML 5 to snuff out Flash. Google and Apple, once lovey-dovey to the point that Google's CEO was on Apple's board of directors, are squared off over Android . And so on. But Microsoft continues to be the big target. Specifically, it's the Microsoft-dominated "desktop model" of computing. I'm not talking about the size or portability of the PC, but rather the metaphor of a desktop, folders, and applications. It's a world in which the so-called network effect makes it nearly impossible for any competitor to catch up. Regardless of how much money Apple spends on those Mac vs. PC commercials, the Mac will forever be a minority player. So both Apple and Google -- for very different reasons -- are setting out to smash the empire by creating entirely new systems. The iPad aims to create a new model of consumer-focused computing and rally independent developers into an army totally controlled by Apple, unable to function without dependence on its company store. That army's rules are harsh. If you wonder, go read the terms to which you have to agree in order to become blessed as an iPad developer. The reward is a perhaps better life than independent developers have had under the bitter rule of Microsoft, which has a habit of visiting upstart startups with an offer they can't refuse. Google's aims are different: to perpetuate its vision of an empire built by organizing all the world's information, not by creating sexy consumer devices. Microsoft is the single biggest threat to that vision, so Google has set forth ...]]></content:encoded><link>http://www.yelvington.com/content/blows-against-empire-ipad-chrome-html5-and-android</link><guid isPermaLink="false">599 at http://www.yelvington.com</guid><author>yelvington</author><pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:03:57 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.yelvington.com/rss20.php">yelvington.com</source><ag:source>yelvington.com</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.yelvington.com/rss20.php</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>Digital Nation – my new documentary – Tuesday 2/2 on PBS</title><description><![CDATA[Digital Nation – a PBS Frontline documentary I’ve been working on for, gosh, two years now – is finally airing this coming Tuesday evening, Feb 2, at 9pm on pretty much all PBS stations in US. (I know: that’s during the Lost premiere that even Obama feared going up against. But you can Tivo Lost, [...]]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object height="344" width="425"><param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QuVtO6otu_U&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" name="movie"><param value="true" name="allowFullScreen"><param value="always" name="allowScriptAccess"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QuVtO6otu_U&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" height="344" width="425"></embed></object></p><p>Digital Nation – a PBS Frontline documentary I’ve been working on for, gosh, two years now – is finally airing this coming Tuesday evening, Feb 2, at 9pm on pretty much all PBS stations in US. (I know: that’s during the Lost premiere that even Obama feared going up against. But you can Tivo Lost, watch us live, and watch Lost after without the commercials.) For those of you outside the viewing area or without TV’s, you can watch the whole thing anytime from broadcast onwards by going to <a href="http://pbsdigitalnation.org">http://pbsdigitalnation.org</a></p><p>Meanwhile, I’m happy to announce that Frontline has agreed to let me host a series of Roundtable discussions following the broadcast. One per month, with invited guests and running commentary from you. (I’m shooting for something like the Talmudic format Steven Johnson used for Feed magazine – still the best threaded dialogues I can remember happening online between a central conversation and the general public. With any luck, these Roundtables will be the next main thing I’m doing</p> ...]]></content:encoded><link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/douglasrushkoff/~3/EK9dgWES6Tk/</link><guid isPermaLink="false">http://rushkoff.com/?p=4095</guid><author>Douglas</author><category>uncategorized+ </category><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 20:46:06 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.rushkoff.com/rssfeed.xml">Douglas Rushkoff</source><ag:source>Douglas Rushkoff</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.rushkoff.com/rssfeed.xml</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>Scott Brown&apos;s Short-lived Bill for a Reporters&apos; Shield</title><content:encoded><![CDATA[Although various groups have lobbied for a reporters' shield law in Massachusetts, the state remains without one. But in 2005, just a year after he was elected to the state Senate, U.S. Sen.-elect Scott Brown made an aborted attempt to change that.<br><br>As the Senate took up debate on the state budget on May 23, 2005, Brown  and former Sen. Brian P. Lees, then the Senate's Republican leader, proposed a reporters' shield law as a budget amendment. But by the end of the first day of budget debate, they had withdrawn the proposed law. No explanation was ever given for why they filed the bill so suddenly or why they withdrew it just as quickly.<br><br>Titled the "Free Flow of Information Act," the bill would have prevented the state from compelling a reporter to testify except in narrow circumstances. It would have absolutely prohibited the state from forcing reporters to disclose confidential sources.<br><br>Brown never refiled the bill, but he did sign on as a sponsor of a <a href="http://www.legaline.com/2007/01/mass-bill-would-shield-reporters.html">shield bill drafted by a coalition</a> of media representatives and filed in 2007. That bill <a href="http://www.legaline.com/2008/07/mass-shield-bill-fizzles-in-legislature.html">died in committee</a>. Two Senate shield bills have been filed in the current session of the legislature, <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/186/st01pdf/ST01673.PDF">SB 1673</a> and <a href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/186/st01pdf/ST01574.PDF">SB 1574</a>. Brown did not sign on as a cosponsor of either.<br><br>When last I counted, Massachusetts was one of 16 states without a shield law.<div class="blogger-post-footer"><img height="1" width="1"></div> ...]]></content:encoded><link>http://www.legaline.com/2010/01/scott-browns-short-lived-bill-for.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8139998.post-8189317457181210141</guid><author>Robert Ambrogi</author><category>shield+law+ </category><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 01:58:00 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.legaline.com/medialaw_rss.xml">Media Law</source><ag:source>Media Law</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.legaline.com/medialaw_rss.xml</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>Regarding the iPad, I am Dr. Buzzkill</title><description><![CDATA[It's here. And I'm disappointed. It's not just that the iPad failed to live up to its hype (which was just short of ending world hunger, curing disease and raising the dead). It's that the iPad doesn't change the world, no matter how many times Steve Jobs says "advanced," "revolutionary," "magical" and "unbelievable." It's certainly no savior for newspapers. What are you going to do, kill your website and sell your "publication" in the App Store? Nonsense. The iPad doesn't change the economic equation. You aren't prevented from selling your content by lack of technology and tools; you're prevented by a lack of market demand. And the demand isn't there because people have, at their fingertips, far more alternatives than the human brain can process -- literally billions . The iPad doesn't change that. If anything, it makes it worse by furthering mobile access to the Web. And by the way: This is 2010. If you're still thinking you run a "publication," you're dead already. It's certainly not a new form factor. Computer makers have been trying to peddle tablets for years. They fall into a chasm between usable sizes. Palm engineered the original Palm Pilot by whittling wood blocks that would fit into a shirt pocket. Guess what: That's pretty much the size of the iPhone, Blackberry, Droid and Pre. Then you have the laptop, which has become the standard computer workstation. Shrink it too much, and it fails (7-inch netbooks are so dead, 9-inch netbooks are struggling). So what happens when you grow the iPhone into that size and shape? We'll see. The list of shortcomings is stunning. No multitasking. Are you kidding me? Palm Pre and Android have it, and they're "just" smartphones. No Flash, so most of the video on the Internet won't play. Also rich-media ads won't play, so stick that in your "savior of journalism" pipe and smoke it. No USB ports, ...]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[It's here. And I'm disappointed. It's not just that the iPad failed to live up to its hype (which was just short of ending world hunger, curing disease and raising the dead). It's that the iPad doesn't change the world, no matter how many times Steve Jobs says "advanced," "revolutionary," "magical" and "unbelievable." It's certainly no savior for newspapers. What are you going to do, kill your website and sell your "publication" in the App Store? Nonsense. The iPad doesn't change the economic equation. You aren't prevented from selling your content by lack of technology and tools; you're prevented by a lack of market demand. And the demand isn't there because people have, at their fingertips, far more alternatives than the human brain can process -- literally billions . The iPad doesn't change that. If anything, it makes it worse by furthering mobile access to the Web. And by the way: This is 2010. If you're still thinking you run a "publication," you're dead already. It's certainly not a new form factor. Computer makers have been trying to peddle tablets for years. They fall into a chasm between usable sizes. Palm engineered the original Palm Pilot by whittling wood blocks that would fit into a shirt pocket. Guess what: That's pretty much the size of the iPhone, Blackberry, Droid and Pre. Then you have the laptop, which has become the standard computer workstation. Shrink it too much, and it fails (7-inch netbooks are so dead, 9-inch netbooks are struggling). So what happens when you grow the iPhone into that size and shape? We'll see. The list of shortcomings is stunning. No multitasking. Are you kidding me? Palm Pre and Android have it, and they're "just" smartphones. No Flash, so most of the video on the Internet won't play. Also rich-media ads won't play, so stick that in your "savior of journalism" pipe and smoke it. No USB ports, ...]]></content:encoded><link>http://www.yelvington.com/content/regarding-ipad-i-am-dr-buzzkill</link><guid isPermaLink="false">598 at http://www.yelvington.com</guid><author>yelvington</author><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:35:40 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.yelvington.com/rss20.php">yelvington.com</source><ag:source>yelvington.com</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.yelvington.com/rss20.php</ag:sourceURL></item>
<item>
<title>Drupalization of Augusta</title><description><![CDATA[The new Augusta Chronicle website is now live, the latest in a series of conversions of Morris websites to a Drupal-based system. Before and after As I mentioned last week, there's a companion mobile-optimized site for smartphones, and if the browser detection is working properly, you'll go to http://m.chronicle.augusta.com/latest-news/2010-01-27/apple-introduces-s... automatically if you request http://chronicle.augusta.com/latest-news/2010-01-27/apple-introduces-sin... with a Blackberry, iPhone, Droid, et cetera. But it's not just about technology. The reason we're moving to Drupal is to create an interactive environment where members of the community and everyone in the newsroom can engage in a broad civic (and, we hope, civil) conversation and contribute content in appropriate ways. In the old world, the Web was a specialty and most reporters and editors had limited access to the tools; in the new world, any staffer and any member of the community can post directly into the system with appropriate access controls. I've written previously about the importance of context in evolving a journalism that conveys meaning to time-pressed citizens. One of the tools we'll be using for that is topics pages that frankly are modeled on those of the New York Times: a synoptic overview of the topic, links to incremental news coverage of the topic, and links to related Web resources. In an early brainstorming meeting with the Chronicle's newsroom, an entire wall was quickly covered with ideas for topics trackers. The Godfather of Soul is a well-executed example. The Chronicle has one of the more active commenting communities among local newspapers I see. It's not always a pretty sight, but executive editor Alan English @aenglish09 has declared that comments will be "assertively moderated." As with previous rollouts of the Morris Site Management System, this one comes with user profile pages Major Drupal modules used in this project are predictable: CCK, ...]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[The new Augusta Chronicle website is now live, the latest in a series of conversions of Morris websites to a Drupal-based system. Before and after As I mentioned last week, there's a companion mobile-optimized site for smartphones, and if the browser detection is working properly, you'll go to http://m.chronicle.augusta.com/latest-news/2010-01-27/apple-introduces-s... automatically if you request http://chronicle.augusta.com/latest-news/2010-01-27/apple-introduces-sin... with a Blackberry, iPhone, Droid, et cetera. But it's not just about technology. The reason we're moving to Drupal is to create an interactive environment where members of the community and everyone in the newsroom can engage in a broad civic (and, we hope, civil) conversation and contribute content in appropriate ways. In the old world, the Web was a specialty and most reporters and editors had limited access to the tools; in the new world, any staffer and any member of the community can post directly into the system with appropriate access controls. I've written previously about the importance of context in evolving a journalism that conveys meaning to time-pressed citizens. One of the tools we'll be using for that is topics pages that frankly are modeled on those of the New York Times: a synoptic overview of the topic, links to incremental news coverage of the topic, and links to related Web resources. In an early brainstorming meeting with the Chronicle's newsroom, an entire wall was quickly covered with ideas for topics trackers. The Godfather of Soul is a well-executed example. The Chronicle has one of the more active commenting communities among local newspapers I see. It's not always a pretty sight, but executive editor Alan English @aenglish09 has declared that comments will be "assertively moderated." As with previous rollouts of the Morris Site Management System, this one comes with user profile pages Major Drupal modules used in this project are predictable: CCK, ...]]></content:encoded><link>http://www.yelvington.com/content/drupalization-augusta</link><guid isPermaLink="false">597 at http://www.yelvington.com</guid><author>yelvington</author><pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 19:15:15 GMT</pubDate><source url="http://www.yelvington.com/rss20.php">yelvington.com</source><ag:source>yelvington.com</ag:source><ag:sourceURL>http://www.yelvington.com/rss20.php</ag:sourceURL></item>
</channel>
</rss>
